ielements architecture kyle grasso venice ca

#Ielements architecture kyle grasso venice ca verification

This rigour is not absolutely indispensable, as this would cast doubt on the value of the self-same research. If this is the case, the very selection of the different elements subject of the analysis presented by Koolhaas and the juxtaposition of so different elements appears questionable. The fundamentals of scientific research are based on classification through the identification of behaviours or characteristics common to families of subjects or elements, chosen on the basis of their differences or similarities, first and foremost a recognized and evident belongingness to a certain species or genre.

#Ielements architecture kyle grasso venice ca verification

And this, on the contrary, is a problem that calls for an attentive verification, and that is capable of confirming or undermining the validity of the premises. Moreover, the verification of the coherence of the approach adopted in the different sections results in a confutation of the exposition precisely with regard to those disciplinary foundations which the exhibition aims to enrich with new suggestions vice versa, the repercussions and prospects in relation to architectural design of a similar reading call for a careful verification of the themes through case studies – works of architecture – chosen in order to study the adequacy of a grammatical analysis – by parts – of the architectural text.ġ) The identification of the elements, their classification and comparison. The second, conversely, has to do with the correctness and congruity with the contemporary approach ofĪ similar retrospective reading. The first concerns the valuation of the scientific rigour with which the research on elements has been conducted a judgment which nevertheless by no means undermines the intrinsic significance of the exhibition. It is a matter of two different questions.

However - while the accentuation of the importance of, and knowledge about, the evolutionary value of single building elements represents a felicitous intuition which allows architectural design to escape the striking and creative gesture - the coherence and value of the proposal, and in the second place its utility with respect to the issues and duties necessary in architecture, has yet to be verified.

The presentation of this issue of Area contains a critical reading of the research hypothesis proposed by Rem Koolhaas with his exhibition Elements of Architecture in which we highlight some salient points worthy of examination, which essentially pivot on the consideration that the exhibition programmatically inverts the “fundamentals“ of the discipline, confusing the means with the ends and architecture with building elements, to the point of asserting not only that the absence of architects from this biennial is intentional, but incidentally – as I see it – that the same applies to architecture if we exclude its fragments or parts: stairs, ramps, lifts, corridors, doors, balconies, toilets, fireplaces, windows, walls, ceilings, facades and so on.